Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Educating Hatbeasts's avatar

Alpha School are doing the same as I am (as a home educator), i.e. using AI provide personalised pacing. I need this because I've got gifted kids with 'spiky' profiles. Alpha School and I are also using it to streamline some types of learning to open up more time for others, such as field trips or science projects.

It really frustrates me where people assume, if parent-educators are using AI, they're using ChatGPT as a full-time personal tutor. I'm sure someone, somewhere, has tried that - but it's not a good idea!

Expand full comment
Eyal Kenigsvain's avatar

I am mostly commenting right now on the section about how AI works. I appreciate the spirit of this, it’s important not to project “thinking” onto systems that don’t have consciousness, intention, or lived experience. But I think describing AI as *just* remixing or predicting words misses something deeper and more consequential. Prediction isn’t trivial, it’s how *we* generate language too. At scale it gives rise to surprising, emergent abilities: generating new metaphors, proposing novel protein structures, even forming hypotheses no one’s written before. These systems don’t “think” like we do, but they can *simulate reasoning* and produce original ideas in ways that extend human cognition. For me, the key isn’t to dismiss AI as a parrot, but to teach our kids how to *orchestrate* it. They should learn to use it as a powerful cognitive partner without confusing it for a mind. That’s where agency and discernment will matter most.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts